All doubts on validity aside, the research was conducted in a method of sociological nature. Since human behavior is very complex it is difficult to narrow down the independent variable. This should help to alleviate many of the doubts towards the ethics of the means of research. However, the research was also very generalizable. There is no doubt that Griffin had opinions on the topic before it was investigated. This then questions the validity of the research. Since it was, in reality, a diary, the information published could be selective. Then it must be asked whether the diary was biased or not. All the persons mentioned in the diary shared the same belief whites were limiting the black potential. His information was derived from a large population across more than one state, while still focusing on the southern parts of America. He had an insider perspective due to his covert observation and participant observation. It can be assumed that the reliability of Griffin’s work is quite substantial. Of coarse when such a research method as a diary is used questions arise as to its validity and reliability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |